Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Month 4 verdict for MacBook Air OK, but not great

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

The size is great, and the keyboard remains a pleasure to type on. I have become dependent on the track pad, which is a total shocker, as I have never liked any of them in the past. The function keys are extremely useful, and I miss them on any other machine.

My consumption and inevitable destruction of technology products provides a great deal of entertainment for my friends.

The positive:

It’s slow. When I open up a file window–let’s say my Applications folder–it takes 10 to 30 seconds before the file list appears. It’s painful when you are in a rush, being much slower than the regular MacBook, let alone the MacBook Pro. Battery life is generally bad. I have yet to get more than 2 hours and 15 minutes since I have owned the notebook. The need to lug around a bunch of accessories (including Apple’s always-burdensome power adapter) defeat much of the purpose. My whole point with the MBA was to have a machine with which I could easily travel. I have been screwed by the lack of Ethernet connectivity at least three times. Many hotels don’t offer Wi-Fi in room. Last week in New York, I had to go to the 24-hour Apple store to buy another USB adapter. It runs hot, and the memory tends to max out at least once a daywhile running very basic applications (Mac Mail,
Mac Calendar,
Safari,
Firefox, and Excel are what I normally run). It’s odd to me that the Apple applications are the items that push the memory over the top, whereas Firefox has gotten much better with it.

The negative:

My first-month check-in with the MacBook Air was overwhelmingly positive. Several months later, not so much. Here is an update on life with my MacBook Air, with 2GB of RAM.

Samsung announces cheapest Blu-ray home theater sy

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

5.1 channel system, 800 watts total power
Four satellite speakers, one center speaker and a passive subwoofer
HDMI output for Blu-ray, and 1080p upconversion for DVDs
Two optical digital audio inputs
Ethernet port for firmware updates only
Onboard decoding for Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD High Resolution
Available in August with a list price of $800

Samsung was officially the first to offer up a home-theater-in-a-box system with Blu-ray (although Panasonic was right behind), but as you might expect, we found the $1,500 system a little overpriced for what it offered. Samsung has now announced a follow-up budget Blu-ray HTIB, the HT-BD2E, and at nearly half the price ($800), it has the potential to be a far more appealing product. Let’s check out the key features, or at least what we know so far.

Key features of the Samsung HT-BD2E:

The following product is available:

On Sale Now: $279.95 - $799.99
View the latest prices for Samsung HT-BD2E

Unlike the $1,500 Samsung HT-BD2, it’s actually pretty difficult to put together a DIY home theater system with the same functionality for $800. If you put together Onkyo’s upcoming HT-S6100 system with a Sony PlayStation 3, you’re already looking at $1,100–although you’d get a lot out of that extra $300.

We’ve confirmed with Samsung that the included Blu-ray player will be a Profile 1.0 player, which means it won’t be able to access any of the Profile 1.1 or Profile 2.0 features available on some newer Blu-ray Discs. You may also notice that there’s no support for the highest-resolution DTS-HD Master Audio soundtrack format, but on a system like this, you probably wouldn’t notice the difference anyways.

If you’re willing to spend a little extra, Samsung is also offering a $1,000 HT-BD2S, which–aside from two extra speakers (7.1 versus 5.1) and a powered subwoofer–is essentially identical to the BD2E model described here. But at that price, we’re much more inclined to put together our own system. We’ll be trying to get a review sample of the HT-BD2E as soon as possible, but until then we’ll remain cautiously optimistic that the system may represent a good value for those looking to get into Blu-ray.

New Sony Blu-ray players Better than PS3

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

On Sale Now: $499.96
View the latest prices for Sony BDP-S550

Step-up features on the BDP-S550

Key features of the Sony BDP-S350:

Supports BonusView, which means it is Profile 1.1 compliant
BD-Live ready, which means it can gain BD-Live capability with a firmware update
Ethernet port for firmware upgrades
Supports 1080p output at both 24 and 60 frames per second
Onboard decoding for Dolby Digital Plus and Dolby TrueHD
Bitstream output for Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio
About $400 list price, scheduled to come out this summer

Is the BDP-S550 the first standalone Blu-ray player better than the PS3?

Sony has announced two new Blu-ray players scheduled to be released in the second half of the year: the entry-level BDP-S350 and the step-up BDP-S550. We haven’t been the biggest fans of Sony’s recent standalone Blu-ray players (the BDP-S300 was really slow and the same price as the PlayStation 3). Fresh off its victory over HD DVD, however, the company has announced two new Blu-ray players for 2008, both of which sport considerably more attractive feature sets and prices. Here are the details:

The following products are available:

On Sale Now: $262.88 - $349.87
View the latest prices for Sony BDP-S350

Onboard decoding for DTS-HD High Resolution and DTS-HD Master Audio
7.1 analog outputs
1GB local storage, which should make it Profile 2.0 compliant
About $500 list price, scheduled to come out in the fall

(Credit:
Sony)

While the BDP-S350 is interesting for its relatively low price point, it’s still going to be hampered by the fact that it costs the same as the
PlayStation 3–which offers almost all the same functionality (except bitstream audio output for high-resolution soundtracks), plus you get a high-definition game console and a media streamer. On the other hand, we could see the BDP-S550 being a hit with home theater enthusiasts because it offers a couple of key step-ups that make is a particularly solid standalone player–DTS-HD Master Audio Decoding and 7.1 analog outputs. We’re betting that the PS3 eventually gets onboard DTS-HD Master Audio decoding–which will make BDP-S550 less attractive–but for right now it looks like a solid option for audiophiles, especially those who plan to use the 7.1 analog outputs. Of course, the BDP-S550 will also have to compete with other step-up standalone players coming out this year and we’re betting the Panasonic DMP-BD50 will give it a run for its money.

Move your e-mail out of Outlook and into the folde

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

Back up the Outlook way via archiving. You may also want to protect your mail, contacts, tasks, and calendar entries within Outlook by archiving your data. The primary advantage of archiving is that everything is backed up with a single action. The disadvantage is that everything lives in a single file, and the data is accessible only in Outlook.

To archive in Outlook 2003, click File > Archive > Personal Folders (or select individual folders, if you wish), enter the date, choose a location for your archive file, give it a name (or go with Outlook’s default in both cases), and click OK. You can ensure that your archive includes everything by checking Include items with “Do Not AutoArchive” checked.

To save a single message to a local folder, open it, and in Outlook 2003, click File > Save As, or in Outlook 2007 click the Office button and choose Save As twice. In both versions, navigate to the folder you want to use, choose a file type in the Save as type drop-down menu, and click Save. Note that in Outlook 2003, the message subject becomes the file name, but in Outlook 2007 you have to give the file a name.

There’s something about Microsoft Outlook that reminds me of the old Soviet Union: the program wants to centralize everything and store it in one big PST file that only it can access. There may be advantages to this approach to managing your e-mail, contacts, tasks, and calendar, but you know what can happen when you put all your eggs in one basket.

Tomorrow: Ubuntu time-saving tips.

Make your auto-archive selections in Outlook's AutoArchive dialog box.

Retrieve your archived data. An archive won’t do you much good if you can’t access it, and Outlook doesn’t make the process particularly easy: Click File > Import and Export > Import from another program or file > Next > Personal Folder File (.pst) > Next. Now browse to and select your archive file, click Do not import duplicates, and choose Next > Finish.

You can also save multiple messages simultaneously by Ctrl-clicking to select them, or Ctrl-A to save them all, and then choosing File > Save As in Outlook 2003, or the Office button and Save As twice in Outlook 2007. They’ll all be saved as a single text file, and you’ll have to give the file a name. Each message in the file begins with the word “From”.

That’s why it makes sense to move copies of your important Outlook files to folders that live outside the Office system. Saving messages and other data to local storage is relatively easy, whether you move them one at a time or in bunches. Note that this is different than backing up (or archiving) the messages, which I’ll also describe.

You could also choose to export the folder as a single Excel or Access file, but using either Comma Separated Values (Windows) or Tab Separated Values (Windows) makes the file much easier to read in Word.

You may also want to note the folder Outlook uses to store this and other files by default, because Microsoft does a good job of making the location impossible to guess. In XP, the path is C:\Documents and Settings\your login name\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook. In Vista, it’s C:\Users\your login name\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outlook.

Archive all your Outlook data by choosing Personal Folders and the current date in the Archive dialog box.

The two most common formats for e-mail are HTML (.htm or .html) and Text Only (.txt): the former opens the message in a browser and preserves the look of the original, but the latter ensures that the message will open in just about any program.

To move an entire folder to your hard drive or other local storage, click File > Import and Export, choose Export to a file, click Next, select Comma Separated Values (Windows), click Next again, choose the folder you want to export, click Next yet again, browse to the location you want to store the folder (unless you want to go with the folder and file name Outlook chose), give the file a name, click Next once more, and then Finish.

Let Outlook do the archiving for you. I get nervous when programs start doing things behind the scenes, but you might prefer to have Outlook archive a folder automatically. To do so, right-click the folder and choose Properties > AutoArchive. If you select Archive items in this folder using the default settings, click Default Archive Settings, and choose your preferred options. Another way to set up auto-archiving is to click Archive this folder using these settings, and make your choices. As far as I can tell, it’s six of one, half a dozen of the other.

Export the contents of an Outlook folder via the Import and Export wizard.

Retail game card sales may hit $100 million this y

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

According to Goldberg, sales of the game cards will be worth $75 million to $100 million this year with an expected run to $500 million by 2010. Interestingly enough, Target was the retailer that figured it out first and convinced Apple to offer iTunes cards.

They’re not activated until they’re purchased, so they don’t sit on the balance sheet of the retailer. They feel like “free money” to retailers. So it’s a very positive business for retailers to get into, and it really lowers the bar for any retailers who are unsure about it, they don’t need to worry about losing money on it.

The first iTunes cards were co-branded and were exclusive to Target. In terms of retailers in North America who were focused on pre-paid cards for digital entertainment, Target were ahead of the curve.

Now, there’s an interesting fact about these cards. Retailers love them over any other product they have in their store, because the cards themselves don’t take up any inventory.

GMG started in the marketing services working with retailers–specifically Target–but around the same time as that, well, it’s not very well known, but it’s Target who actually brought the idea of the pre-paid iTunes card to Apple and sold them on that.

The really big untapped market for these digital media companies is gift giving. No matter how much someone loves an online world no one is going to say “hey, merry Christmas. I logged into your account and gave you 25 bucks.” Not to mention the impulse buy.

The tale of retail game cards is a pretty amazing one. In a recent interview Rob Goldberg, founder and CEO of GMG Entertainment, a publisher of “digital currency cards” that you see on sale at Target, Safeway and a number of other big-box shops, shed some light on how the market came to be and where it’s going in the future.

It’s a great interview if you have even a remote interest in virtual goods and gaming. It also shows that no matter how bad the economy is, someone will figure out how to make you spend your money.

And why do retailers love these cards? The economics work in their favor.

Digital invites suit up for black-tie affairs

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

One of the biggest drawbacks to electronic invitations for an event planning veteran like Chen was that they were neither attractive nor customizable enough for upscale or formal events. Facebook invitations cannot be modified beyond the social network’s blue-and-white design, and Evite still pretty much relies on clip art. Though Evite still owns the lion’s share of the digital invitation market, with stats from Hitwise showing that its traffic far eclipses that of its smaller rivals combined, alternatives like MyPunchbowl, Renkoo, Centerd, and Socializr offer different looks and feels for different kinds of events and hosts.

Proponents of digital invitations admit that there are lingering reasons, beyond etiquette, that sometimes compel hosts to stick to paper invitations. Chen said that the occasional client would raise the question that e-mail invites might not make it past a spam filter, and added that others were concerned about how much of a splash an e-mail could possibly make in an age of clogged Outlook inboxes.

As for invitations for wedding ceremonies themselves, Gabel said they’re creeping in. “I see a couple of them a day,” he observed.

News.com Poll E-etiquette for weddings
Would you consider sending out electronic wedding invitations?

Manners expert Lowe still isn’t convinced, saying that the chance to be economical isn’t enough to sway him. “There are always ways to do (paper invitations) in a cost-effective way,” he said. “You can get paper, print them yourself, hand-write them.” As for being environmentally friendly, “(that) point is actually quite well-taken because it does create quite a lot of paper waste. What might be interesting is to see if there are people or companies that come up with very low-impact ways of generating invitations that are either easily recyclable or directly reusable.”

Chen has since started using Pingg, an invitation start-up geared toward a more discerning crowd. “There was a whole segment of event types that people just did not want to use electronic invitations for,” Pingg co-founder Lorien Gabel said of his rationale behind creating the company, which gives the option for hosts to accompany their digital invites with print versions for all or some of the guests. “I’d like to believe that because of how we do things you also get the aesthetic aspect of it, you don’t have to sacrifice it.”

“If you really know your guests and you really know it’s a preference for them, I think that’s great,” Lowe said. “Absolutely times are changing, and what is appropriate changes.”

As host of the popular Modern Manners Guy podcast, Lowe attempts to marry–pun completely intended–the culture of traditional etiquette with a digital world that increasingly threatens to subvert its longstanding norms. And he admits up front that he thinks using the likes of Evite and MyPunchbowl for formal occasions is “a terrible idea” for the most part; except when difficult circumstances demand it, as was the case when he received a digital wedding invitation recently. There was an illness in the groom’s family, and the date of the wedding had to be pushed up to the point where there was no longer a wide enough time frame to order formal paper invitations. “(They) changed to Evite for expedience’s sake,” Lowe explained.

Electronic wedding invitations aren’t exactly Adam Lowe’s cup of tea.

View results

But people are going digital, and Chen said that recipients have grown acclimated to it, especially as the younger generation grows up. “I think it’s generational,” she said. “People always wanted to speak to the hostess when they made a reservation at a restaurant. Now they just use OpenTable.” Indeed, a 25-year-old getting married in 2008 likely had an e-mail address before he or she had a driver’s license. Teenagers celebrating bar mitzvahs and Sweet 16s can’t remember a time when the Internet wasn’t everywhere.

“I would’ve been hard-pressed to come up with an example where (electronic wedding invitations) would be acceptable except when real life intervenes,” he added.

“At New York Fashion Week, you’ve got 12 days of shows and events and it’s highly, highly competitive,” Chen said. “If you don’t send out a paper invitation, (it doesn’t work). There’s something about it landing on someone’s desk and having it be tactile.”

Online invitation services like the InterActiveCorp-owned Evite, the Events application on Facebook, as well as smaller start-ups like Socializr and MyPunchbowl, are nothing new. They’ve more or less taken over the RSVP duties for backyard barbecues, Halloween parties, birthdays, and even holiday cocktail soirees. Paper invitations still reign at the upper echelon: weddings and high-end corporate events, as well as other formal occasions like bar mitzvahs, proms, and charity fundraisers. But at this point, there are only a few tenuous standards of etiquette that are keeping this relic of the analog age alive and kicking.

No way, that’s tacky
Sure, it’s eco-conscious and convenient
Only in an unexpected pinch

With the option of sending a pretty, well-designed electronic invitation now out there, they become more of a viable alternative for organizers of higher-end events who happen to be conscious of environmental impact, cost, or efficiency. “Not having to use paper is huge when you’re trying to be eco-conscious,” Celia Chen said. “It’s better for the environment, it’s cheaper if not free, and you’re collecting the majority of your RSVPs in a place where there’s no human error. People either hit ‘yes,’ ‘no,’ or ‘maybe,’ and it’ll download into a list.”

But if you look at the ultimate gauge of formal events–weddings–things are certainly changing in favor of the digital. “A large, not quite a quarter yet, but about 20 percent of our events are actually wedding-related,” Lorien Gabel said, saying that plenty of bachelor parties and bridal showers show up on Pingg.

But Lowe acknowledged that for efficiency’s sake, as well as to fit the culture of the digital age, sometimes there are reasons to try and bridge the gap. He suggested that for events like weddings and bar mitzvahs, organizers could send out an electronic “save-the-date” in advance that would allow guests to opt out of a paper invitation if they preferred the digital route.

“In the past, I never would have thought to use an electronic invitation, because I don’t know if it was as much of a formality as it was about brand awareness and being so protective over how the brand was portrayed,” said Celia Chen, a former luxury-brand event planner who now writes the blog Notes on a Party. “Image was so important: the paper stock, the font. We would have invitation designers, and we’d go through multiple edits.”

But “real life” gets in the way in more ways than we think, and people like Lowe may be in the minority soon. The eco-consciousness movement is encouraging us to cut down on unnecessary paper use, and tough economic conditions compel us to be thrifty. And when technology is able to cut down on hours of guest-list organization, the digital route is an obvious one–especially for a generation of young adults that has always used Google search in lieu of the Yellow Pages.

With 22-channel launch, Dish approaches DirecTV’s

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

For the record, I’m with most people who care: I wish all broadcasters would show all content in the original aspect ratio, and leave it to us to press the “aspect” or “zoom” or “format” keys on our remotes to fill the screen if we so desire. To date, some do (Jake 2.0 on SciFi HD, when I checked, had the proper black bars to either side of the 4:3 image) but many do not. The excellent guide to DirecTV’s channels at Digitalcaffeine.com breaks down which channels stretch and which leave the program unaltered–it applies equally to other providers, including Dish. Unfortunately, the anti-stretch-o-vision petition has been closed.

For a full breakdown of Dish vs. DirecTV’s high-def programming, and how it currently compares with cable and Verizon Fios, check out the big chart.

SciFi HD is among the 22 new HD channels launched by Dish Network.

Ever since DirecTV launched a slew of national high-definition channels last October and November, it’s been the only place most Americans can get their Cartoon Network, Sci-Fi, and Bravo networks in high-def. On Monday, Dish network caught up somewhat, announcing the activation of a total of 22 new high-def channels, including those three and many other national, high-interest channels–as well as a few lower-interest ones, including World Fishing Network HD. Twenty of the channels are supposed to go live Monday, and the last two, the regional sports networks (RSNs) Comcast Sports Network Bay Area HD and Comcast Sports Network New England HD, will be activated Wednesday, according to the company. Check out the full list of new channels on the official press release.

Of course, just because a channel has a big “HD” stamped next to it in the on-screen programming guide doesn’t mean you’ll be glorying in full-fledged high-def every time you turn it on. In fact, most of the new channels Dish added, and indeed most so-called HD channels on any provider, deliver a steady diet of upconverted programming that originates in standard-def–and usually doesn’t look much better when shown on an HD channel. Worse, many HD channels stretch their squarish 4:3 shows to fill the rectangular 16:9 HDTV screens, resulting in shorter, fatter people, oblong circles, and similar distortions. I flipped by something on HGTV HD and even noticed the tell-tale disproportional stretch similar to some HDTVs’ “panorama” or “Just” modes, where the sides of the screen are stretched more than the middle in an attempt to make people in the central area of the screen look less distorted.

According to our count, the new additions bring Dish’s total number of HD channels to 95, just under DirecTV’s 104. Excluding RSNs, on-demand/Pay-per-view channels, exclusives like Dish’s Voom channels, and duplicate East/West feeds, we count an even 50 national and local HD channels on Dish Network, and 60 on DirecTV. Dish is still missing some well-known networks like FX HD, MTV HD, and Nickelodeon HD, while DirecTV still doesn’t carry World Fishing Network (the nerve!) or ABC Family HD, but overall DirecTV still maintains an advantage in channels we expect more people care about.

(Credit:
CNET)

The curmudgeon’s guide to horrible Facebook apps

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

Now that we've established, the price, ma'am…

These apps are so viral they’re becoming serious marketing tools. So who are you playing for? (Related: Facebook advice from zombies.)

Kill me now.

We’ve previously covered the stupidest Facebook apps, but there are a few apps that are not just dumb, they’re insidious. Invasive. Annoying in ways that go beyond vibrating hamsters and virtual poo. I’m talking about apps that assault your e-mail, tease you with personal messages from friends but turn out to be spam, or rope you into playing games that keep you coming back even though you can feel your IQ lowering every time you do so. Therefore, I nominate these as the worst Facebook apps ever:

A co-worker here, Andrew Mager, takes issue with my opinion, and says there’s serious strategy involved in Friends for Sale. He contributes to a blog on this topic, Sell Your Friends. Key quote from the site: “If you like getting addicted to social applications, this one is perfect.” I rest my case.

Friends for Sale. Really a more evolved version of Vampires. You buy friends with fake money and then some other chump buys them from you at a fake profit. How much are you worth? Not much? There goes your evening, trying to get people to buy you. There goes your your self esteem with it. I also hate this app because my wife is worth about eight times than I am.

What is the most abusive Facebook app?

( surveys)

Hey, here’s a great app: read a book! Or go run around outside.

Inviting.

Various quizzes. You get invited to a quiz app, start entering your preferences, and get some utterly specious score comparing you to the person who roped you in. The quality of the information you get out is extraordinarily low compared with the time it takes you to put in the information that generates the score. But because the invitation to the quiz comes from your friend, you engage in the app anyway. Worse still are quizzes that don’t work at all until you invite others to sign up, like the American Accent quiz. How do you pronounce, “Sucker?”

FunWall. The No. 1 Facebook app, according to Appsaholic. And the No. 1 abuser of the privilege. Sure, your friends can send you cute videos and posters with it, but to see the messages you’ve got to install the app, and if you ever try to send a message to a friend, you are more than likely to inadvertently spam your entire Facebook network since all your friends are selected by default when you press the “forward” button. What makes this especially bad is that your friends will then get e-mail saying that you’ve sent them a personal FunWall post, install the app themselves, and start the cycle anew. I’ve found FunWall content to be 90 percent spam. If it wasn’t for the 10 percent of the posts that are not, I could write it off. I may anyway.

Vampires, Zombies, Jedis, etc. In these apps you attack your friends to gain status and levels and win extra points for recruiting new friends into the game. These apps are strangely addictive, but a colossal waste of time. One the one hand, they’re like World of Warcraft (you level up, but without the quests and gameplay). On the other, they’re social network slot machines, but with no financial payout. Actually that’s the same hand, the bad hand. On the other hand…nothing.

Green-tech news harvest Wind-powered sports car

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

Administration allies strike against ethanol critics — MarketWatch
A "smear campaign" against ethanol? Secretary of the Agriculture Department says ethanol mandates are needed to diversify the U.S.’s fuel supply. Suspending mandates wouldn’t lower food prices all that much, he says.

New World Record For Efficiency For Solar Cells — ScienceDaily
European researchers boost polysilicon solar cell efficiency from 21.9 to 23.2 percent by adding a layer of aluminum oxide. It’s a significant boost done with an inexpensive material, they say.
Chevy Volt: Traveling Public Roads and Hitting Its Mark — AutoObserver
Chevy Volt goes 40 miles on a battery in test drives in a mule chassis. The plug-in hybrid sports car is due out in 2010.

Sony Unveils Ultrasmall Hybrid Fuel Cell — Tech-On
Sony looks to put fuel cells in gadgets, following a prototype that Sharp demonstrated last week that uses methanol as a fuel.

Oil Left in the Ground — Technology Review
We have smart grids–why not have "smart oil fields?" Interest in existing oil fields, where as much as 75 percent of the total oil still remains, is growing for geopolitical and economic reasons.

Reality Check: Consumers Unlikely to Pay Much More for Green — WSJ.com
Climate change will hit our pocket books in the form of higher utility rates. What to do? Efficiency is best option, but after that, opinions seem to split.

Canon patents fuel cell-powered cameras — Crave — CNET Asia
Fuel cells are coming to consumer electronics, it seems. Quite a bit of activity on this front in the past week.

Here’s a sampling of recent
green-tech news:

Ecotricity CEO’s Electric Car Is "Not Another Tesla" — TreeHugger
A British wind mogul wants to build a "wind-powered sports
car." Two top requirements are that it’s not "crap" like today’s electric cars, has a range of 150 miles, and goes fast: "naught to 60 in 4 seconds." Here’s a short video clip:

Verizon unveils low-cost unlimited data plan

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

(Credit:
CNET Networks)

Unlimited plans have been all the rage among the carriers lately, as they try and one-up each other with new pricing. With the growing popularity of smartphones, it also makes sense that pricing competition would start to become more common among the data services as well.

If you’ve got a Motorola Q9m, a Verizon Wireless SMT5800 (HTC) or a Verizon Wireless XV6800 (UTStarcom), you can now add a $29.99-a-month e-mail and Web browsing plan to your “qualifying” voice plan. Exactly what the qualifications are was left unsaid in Verizon’s press release.

Verizon trotted out a low-cost all-you-can-eat data plan for its subcribers Monday, although it’s only available on a few phones.

Verizon said it would include more phones in the new plan over the next few months. There’s already such a plan in place for BlackBerry users.

The Motorola Q9m is one of the three phones eligible for a new Verizon data plan.